<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="https://news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/plugins/btr_rss/btr_rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
	<channel>
		<title>Rank &#8211; Samsung Global Newsroom</title>
		<atom:link href="https://news.samsung.com/global/tag/rank/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>https://news.samsung.com/global</link>
        
        <currentYear>2015</currentYear>
        <cssFile>https://news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/plugins/btr_rss/btr_rss_xsl.css</cssFile>
		<description>What's New on Samsung Newsroom</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:44:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
					<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Samsung Ranked #1 in Corporate Brand Reputation in the U.S.]]></title>
				<link>https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-ranked-1-in-corporate-brand-reputation-in-the-u-s</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 08:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
								<media:content url="https://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/samsung-tomorrow1-700x424.jpg" medium="image" />
				<dc:creator><![CDATA[SamsungTomorrow]]></dc:creator>
						<category><![CDATA[Press Release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Brand Reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NO.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Institutes RepTrakR100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit.ly/1TCbOFZ</guid>
									<description><![CDATA[Samsung Electronics announced the company has been named by the Reputation Institute as the most reputable technology company in the United States. The Reputation Institutes RepTrakR100 study recognizes Samsung as the leader in corporate reputation defined by several criteria including social responsibility and citizenship, innovation, product and services excellence, and creating a great workplace environment. […]]]></description>
																<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung Electronics announced the company has been named by the Reputation Institute as the most reputable technology company in the United States.</p>
<p>The <span style="color: #0000ff"><strong>Reputation Institutes RepTrakR100</strong></span> study recognizes Samsung as the leader in corporate reputation defined by several criteria including social responsibility and citizenship, innovation, product and services excellence, and creating a great workplace environment.</p>
<p>“Delivering amazing products and services is just one part of the Samsung story,” says Gregory Lee, president and chief executive officer of Samsung Electronics North America. “Being recognized as an industry leading place to work that gives back to the communities we serve is a true honor.”</p>
<p>The Reputation Institute’s RepTrakR model is the gold standard for reputation measurement, providing a one-of-a-kind measurement of how the public views the world’s best-known companies. The study examines perceptions of companies by the US general public based on over 50,000 interviews. The RepTrakR database is normative, examining 15 stakeholder groups in more than 25 industries and more than 50 countries for more than 7,000 companies.</p>
<p>“Technology companies with strong reputations recognize that their reputations are dependent on more than just the products and services they provide,” says Brad Hecht, chief research officer at Reputation Institute (RI). “The second most important driver of reputation in the technology industry is governance, or whether a company is responsibly run, fair and transparent.”</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-size: small">About Reputation Institute</span></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small">Reputation Institute (RI) is the world’s leading research-based consulting and advisory firm for reputation. RI enables many of the world’s leading companies to make more confident business decisions that build and protect reputation capital, analyze risk and sustainability topics, and drive competitive advantage. RI’s most prominent management tool is the RepTrakR model for analyzing the reputations of companies and institutions – best known via the Global RepTrakR 100, the world’s largest and most comprehensive study of corporate reputations, as well as Country RepTrakR and City RepTrakR studies that look at reputation across organizations within a given geography.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
																				</item>
					<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Samsung Electronics Ranked No. 1  for 4G LTE/LTE-A Standard-Essential Patents]]></title>
				<link>https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-electronics-ranked-no-1-for-4g-ltelte-a-standard-essential-patents</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
								<media:content url="https://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Official_Samsung_Thumb.jpg" medium="image" />
				<dc:creator><![CDATA[SamsungTomorrow]]></dc:creator>
						<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE-A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NO.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Electronics]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit.ly/1VzGPIp</guid>
									<description><![CDATA[The Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) recently ranked Samsung Electronics No. 1 among industry peers for possessing the largest number of 4G LTE/LTE-Advanced (LTE-A) standard-essential patents (SEP). The ranking is based on a two-year- study by the TIPO, which culminated in a report titled, ‘2014 Results of Research on Telecom Technology Patent Trends and Patent […]]]></description>
																<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Official_Samsung_Blog.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-56850" src="http://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Official_Samsung_Blog.jpg" alt="Official_Samsung_Blog" width="828" height="548" /></a></p>
<p>The Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) recently ranked Samsung Electronics No. 1 among industry peers for possessing the largest number of <span style="color: #0000ff"><strong>4G LTE/LTE-Advanced (LTE-A)</strong></span> standard-essential patents (SEP). The ranking is based on a two-year- study by the TIPO, which culminated in a report titled, ‘2014 Results of Research on Telecom Technology Patent Trends and Patent Litigation Analysis.’</p>
<p>TIPO analyzed approximately 6,200 4G LTE/LTE-A related patents filed before the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), focusing on SEPs that were essential to the 4G LTE/LTE-A standards. Samsung SEPs accounted for 17% of the 3,600 4G LTE/LTE-A SEPs owned by the 35 companies that were assessed.</p>
<p>“Through our relentless R&D efforts, our standard-essential patents have contributed to shaping the standards that have guided the evolution of the mobile telecommunications industry.” said Heungmo Lee, Senior Vice President and the Head of IP Prosecution Team, Digital Media & Communications R&D Center, Samsung Electronics.</p>
<p>Samsung has a long history of advancing mobile telecommunications technology. In 1998, Samsung first joined standardization organizations for mobile telecommunications technology, such as 3GPP. In 2001, the company won an important seat in the 3rd Generation Partnership Project.</p>
<p>With regards to 4G LTE mobile telecommunications technology, Samsung pursued the ambitious goal of establishing a leadership position in this area. To this end, Samsung developed telecommunications solutions and mobile devices while simultaneously conducting extensive R&D to strengthen the competitiveness of the company’s standardization efforts. As a result, Samsung was able to release the industry’s first commercial products and services embedded with LTE/LTE-A technology, as evidenced by the LTE dongle in 2009, Voice over LTE (VoLTE) service in 2012 and Carrier Aggregation technology in 2013.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
																				</item>
					<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Galaxy S6 and S6 edge Rank First in DxOMark Tests]]></title>
				<link>https://news.samsung.com/global/galaxy-s6-and-s6-edge-rank-first-in-dxomark-tests</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
								<media:content url="https://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DxoMark-Tests_Main_Thumb-700x424.jpg" medium="image" />
				<dc:creator><![CDATA[SamsungTomorrow]]></dc:creator>
						<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DxOMark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy S6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy S6 edge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rank]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit.ly/1p2tSwo</guid>
									<description><![CDATA[Having achieved outstanding scores in a number of DxOMark Mobile industry standard tests, the Samsung Galaxy S6 and S6 edge has become the top-ranked device in the company’s database, which grades mobile devices based on the technical measurements of their lenses and cameras. In addition, Samsung Galaxy Note 4 holds on the second place. Overview: […]]]></description>
																<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having achieved outstanding scores in a number of DxOMark Mobile industry standard tests, the Samsung Galaxy S6 and S6 edge has become the top-ranked device in the company’s database, which grades mobile devices based on the technical measurements of their lenses and cameras. In addition, Samsung Galaxy Note 4 holds on the second place.</p>
<p><span style="color: #333399"><strong>Overview: Outstanding Photo and Video Quality</strong></span></p>
<p>Achieving an overall DxOMark Mobile Score of 86, the new Samsung Galaxy S6 and S6 edge are the new leader for smartphone image quality. This score puts it seven points ahead of its predecessor, the Galaxy S5, which now sits in fourth place overall with 79 points.</p>
<p><a href="http://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DxOMark_Main_1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-51098" src="http://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DxOMark_Main_1.jpg" alt="DxOMark Mobile Score of 86" width="828" height="379" /></a></p>
<p>The Galaxy S6 and S6 edge’s overall DxOMark Mobile score of 86 is a combination of its performance results across still and video tests in the Photo and Video sub-scores. Achieving a Photo sub-score of 88 and a Video sub-score of 84 means that the Galaxy S6 and S6 edge are slightly better for still photography, but both results put the device ahead of the rest of the smartphone competition.</p>
<p><span style="color: #333399"><strong>Mobile Photo Sub-scores </strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DxOMark_Main_2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-51099" src="http://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DxOMark_Main_2.jpg" alt="Mobile Photo Sub-scores" width="828" height="548" /></a></p>
<p>Analysis of the data behind the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 edge’s DxOMark Mobile Photo sub-score of 88 identifies the smartphone’s strengths and weaknesses. Its strengths are good exposure, fast autofocus and good detail with minimal noise, characteristics that each received a score of 90 points or more. More importantly, its excellent Exposure & Contrast score of 90 was obtained while shooting in both bright light and low-light environments, with the latter often the downfall of smaller-sensor cameras.</p>
<p><span style="color: #333399"><strong>Video Sub-scores </strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DxOMark_Main_3.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-51100" src="http://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DxOMark_Main_3.jpg" alt="Video Sub-scores " width="828" height="548" /></a></p>
<p>Video capabilities on the Galaxy S6 and S6 edge are strong, and although its score of 84 is not quite as high as its Photo sub-score of 88, it is still among the best performing phones tested by DxOMark Mobile. Its ability to shoot fine detail with low noise in both bright and low light, good exposure and good white balance and color contribute to this high score.</p>
<p>For more information about DxOMark Mobile and its testing scores for the Samsung Galaxy S6 and S6 edge, visit the <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Phones" target="_blank">DxOMark website.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
																				</item>
			</channel>
</rss>